Skip navigation

Collaboration

Displaying 1 - 10 of 20
Purpose: To improve research collaborations by providing an understanding of the importance of two kinds of differences among partners, as well as providing ways of dealing with those differences. Description: The point of a research collaboration is to harness the different expertise and attributes of various partners in order to develop a comprehensive understanding of […]
Resource Type:
Shares tips for collaboration between HASS (Humanities, Arts and Social Science) and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Medicine/Mathematics) sectors based on experience undertaking research on water-related issues. Provides an analogy with marriage-like relationships, starting with “blind to the faults, keen on the charms”, moving on to dealing with differences and conflicts, accepting each other’s imperfections […]
Resource Type:
Purpose: To provide practical guidance on collaboration in research teams. Description: The Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide (now in its second edition) is divided into 13 chapters with supportive case studies, covering: Engaging in team science: What is a scientific research team? Preparing yourself for team science: The value of self-reflection; understanding personality types; […]
Resource Type:
“The Collaboration Success Wizard is an on-line diagnostic survey for geographically distributed collaborations. The survey probes factors that may strengthen or weaken the collaboration. The Wizard provides both personal and project-level reports to help build successful and productive collaborative projects.” The survey tool is only available on application, but can be used for past, present […]
Resource Type:
Individual competencies for interdisciplinary research collaboration were identified using a Delphi method which drew on expert opinion. Twenty-four competencies were identified in the following five clusters: intrapersonal, including broad intellectual curiosity and an open mind disciplinary awareness and exchange, including assumptions, limitations and contributions of own and other disciplines processes of integration, including integration of […]
Resource Type:
A list of questions for scientific collaborators helps identify – before collaborating – core issues such as authorship, adding additional collaborators, and identification of who does what in the collaboration. The rationale is: “People often assume that since they share an interest in the same research area and have complementary skills and areas of expertise, […]
Resource Type:
Purpose: To systematically solicit and collate expert judgments on a particular topic, which also provides a structured way for the experts to build on each other’s ideas. Description: Each expert is asked for their judgment on a topic using a questionnaire or interview; this does not require the experts to meet. The responses are collated and summarised and returned to the experts before proceeding with a second round of questions about the topic, often leading to voting on a particular question...
Purpose: This curated online directory, called Public Design Vault, aims to provide an "all-in-one, a full-stop one-stop, a mother list of lists, a singularity for the plethora of toolkits and resources that are available on the vast internet." It aims to include "all the well-known usual suspects" as well as "a few diamonds in the rough."
The Toolbox consists of a series of questions to probe team member views on the practice of science and acts as a stimulus for discussion. Questions cover motivation, methodology, confirmation, objectivity, values and reductionism and emergence. This philosophically structured dialogue can be used to uncover worldviews that frame what investigators see, what priorities they set, […]
Reflections by 14 teams linking health and social scientists identified key attributes which help or hinder success relating to: principal investigators, shared starting point, role of language, and role of the institution. These include factors internal to the team such as personal characteristics, serendipitous encounters, status and language differences, as well as factors external to […]

About this site Updated:   30 June 2019 / Responsible Officer:   Manager i2S / Page Contact:   Webmaster